Gladwell on why focus groups suck
Malcolm Gladwell recently gave the keynote at the American Association of Advertising Agencies’ Account Planning conference in Chicago. It’s excerpted on Advertising Age ($). If you’ve worked in design or product development (or read “Blink”) you know the drawbacks of focus groups. But what Gladwell does here is describe the solutions as ones of management. Not surprisingly, I agree.
Here’s the ending…
Now think about the Aeron chair. [The focus group participants] say they don’t like the chair, of course they don’t. The chair is nothing they’ve ever seen before, but that was the whole plan in designing the chair. But that’s what’s wonderful about it, that’s why this chair will make billions of dollars for Herman Miller, but it’s also what dooms that chair in the focus group, because people don’t have the language.
Market research, when it is observational or when it is interpretative, is profoundly useful. But those are two critical things. They require the intervention of the person conducting the research. They require the findings that are gathered are considered, and thought about, and processed and interpreted. Back in the 1950s, most of the major advertising agencies on Madison Avenue employed Freudian psychoanalysts for this precise reason, and you don’t see that anymore. I think that’s a big mistake.
This understanding about what’s so terrible about focus groups ought to pave the way that we manage people. First and foremost, it’s very important for management to trust the creative talent.
The second thing is patience. The more breakthrough, the more revolutionary and the more innovative an idea is, the longer it will take for people to come to appreciate it.
The third thing is it requires people in management to tolerate uncertainty. The thing that’s driving all this focus-group and market-research data is the desire of people with the management power to make every decision as methodical and thought out and certain as possible.
WorkHappy.net: killer resources for entrepreneurs on 06 Sep 2005 at 5:55 pm
Happy Links
Seth Godin just released a free eBook today about blogs and the New Web. I’ve mirrored a copy of the book here. 10 Steps to a Hugely Successful Web 2.0 Company offers some great advice for anyone trying to build
3e-lab, home of rob poitras on 06 Sep 2005 at 6:39 pm
Effectiveness of Focus Groups
Gladwell on why focus groups suck
This understanding about what’s so terrible about focus groups ought to pave the way that we manage people. First and foremost, it’s very important for management to trust the creative talent.
The second thing i…
What Caucuses and Focus Groups Have in Common « Brett’s Blog on 08 Jan 2008 at 4:22 pm
[...] to represent the masses. Obviously, 8 people can’t effectively represent 20 million people, and we marketers are the ones with the training and experience in knowing consumers, not the knuckle… Be sure any decision you make is the one you can stand by without blaming the focus group. Cuz the [...]
AutoCAD Inventor Suite 2010 Sucks | Open Design Project on 18 Sep 2009 at 11:03 am
[...] the old dinosaur of a program, AutoCAD. I’m sure they spent bazillions of dollars in research, focus groups, taste tests, and what-not to come to the conclusion that something needed to happen as far as [...]
SimCity mess shows how little faith business should put in beta tests – Quartz on 11 Mar 2013 at 10:29 am
[...] Gladwell wrote about this in his book Blink, noting that the now-legendary Aeron Chair was loathed by early testers. Focus groups, and to a certain extent betas, are a highly unnatural setting in which human—i.e. [...]