Sarah astutely pointed out that the riveting 1900 House is essentially PBS’s version of Survivor.
Category: Unfiled
-
-
I just found the book Crossing Platforms: A Macintosh/Windows Phrasebook. I’m glad someone wrote this book (and in particular these authors, as they are quite qualified). I can put away that nagging feeling that I should have finished my version.
-
I’ve resolved not to bother reacting to anything from that one usability guy, so I won’t post this link, which had me laughing out loud.
-
nth consecutive day of rain in New York, yuck. Not enough exercise, have reverted back to coffee from tea, and feeling existential about most things.
-
I wonder if the deliberate use of pheromones will decrease our receptivity to them?
Recently I heard the use of anti-bacterial soap encourages the growth of “super-bacteria” and that you’re better off with normal soap, but that has an urban legend ring to it now that I write it down.
-
Wow. Both Bruce Tognazzini and Brenda Laurel joined the Nielson Norman Group. All they need now is Don Norman and Joy Mountford and they’ll have the dream team.
-
Failure Magazine is along the lines of what I was referring to in Sweden’s ill-designed 17th century warship, or France’s statue to a cyclist that rode himself to death. Holding up a surpreme effort and learning, and gaining inspiration from, the failure.
-
Usually I perceive advertising as necessary evil on web sites, though ads in general can play a useful role in calling our attention to useful stuff, if in a mostly ugly and untargetted way.
Once in a while when flipping through a big ad-laden magazine like Wired I get absorbed in the meta-reading activity of looking at page after page of ads and wondering what they were thinking with each particular creative and marketing approach. Part of me is also just reading the ads in consumer mode like the advertisers want me to. I also think about how we watch TV shows about famous TV ads, make a big deal about the Super Bowl ads, and mimic ads (my relatively conservative father just sent me an email with the subject, “Whassup?”).
Recently I wondered, if these big, creative, attractive ads so captivate people that it’s conceivable to fill 20 consecutive pages with them, would people also want to experience them similarly on the web? The Onion I think comes closest to this with their long list of “sponsers”. But imagine taking the next step: a broadband site where you could navigate through the content but also step through a linear progression of big, beautiful advertisements. Would people want to do this? My gut says yes, some people would. And if that pays for great content then it’s worth pursuing.
-
Just had to post this picture of my cousins, just ‘cus…
-
eNormicon and Signals vs. Noise have gotten some linkage recently, but the real gem is the authors’ company site, 37signals. I think I just read every page on the site, and then went to a site they designed and ordered something. It’s a company you could take home to mom.
-
Having worked in the recording industry (my original career track was becoming a recording engineer) I feel little pity for them in these days of free Napster-music. They’ve held on to old, star- and marketing-driven business models too long, mostly out of stupidity and greed. Even now, they just want control and not to actually adapt to changing times.
I’d love to hear one record exec say, “We’ve got to throw out our oxygen-sucking marketing and A&R departments and use the Internet to give people the music they want at a reasonable price that makes us a reasonable profit.”
Too bad emusic.com isn’t more popular. I love getting this They Might Be Giants album for $.99 a song or $8.99 for almost an hour of music. I bet the artists make a higher profit in the end too.
-
Now I know that daemon is “from the mythological meaning, later rationalized as the acronym `Disk And Execution MONitor’ “. Perhaps that’s why it’s so often pronounced DEE-men.
-
Our CFO’s father is a partner at PriceWaterhouse Coopers, and therefore the latter company had to resign as our auditors. According to Dow Jones, “The SEC requires that a partner of an accounting firm who has a close relative with an important position with an audit client be geographically separated from the relative and from the engagement team by at least 500 miles to reduce undue influence.” Seems kinda arbitrary and paternalistic to me.
-
Patagonia’s self-imposed Earth Tax is a great idea, I’m surprised it didn’t occur to me earlier to follow their lead. My new business plan will include a similar tax, but targeted more towards improving my daytime environment of New York City.