Want to Be An Expert? Practice for Ten Years

In Daniel Coyle’s article on Russian tennis players we receive another interesting tidbit from the Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. We already knew about the need for feedback, but this is the first I’ve heard of the Ten-Year Rule: “an intriguing finding dating to 1899, which shows that even the most talented individual requires a decade of committed practice before reaching world-class level.

That makes me feel better about all the skills I’m still struggling with.

And if you’re looking to turn your child into a super athlete, the U.S. Olympic committee leverages the ten-year rule to provide advice on windows of optimal trainability.

Published by


Responses

  1. michael Avatar
    michael

    Excellent article. This reminds me of an article I read on a related topic a few years ago: Teach Yourself Programming in Ten Years. I used to believe that certain types of aptitude or talent were innate, and that may be true in some cases, but as this article shows, experience can be as good a factor in influencing talent.

  2. Steve Portigal Avatar
    Steve Portigal

    I’m glad that point still circulates – it made a strong impression on me lo these many years ago in an undergrad cognitive science class; some landmark paper that looked at chess masters and also (or maybe a different paper) Louis Armstrong.
    10 dedicated years to reach that level.
    It’s definitely humbling but also tantalizing since it does put it in reach.

  3. Marc Rettig Avatar
    Marc Rettig

    I have been living by the comfort of another “ten years to mastery” quote, from a lecture about photography.

    David Lyman, the founder of the Maine Photographic Workshop, “The Eight Keys to Success” (http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0410/lyman.html):

    “I have asked hundreds of accomplished photographers, writers, filmmakers, painters and musician how long it took before they felt they were able to speak from a source within. Ten years has been their unanimous answer.”

    “If it takes 10 years, then how do you spend the time wisely? It will take at least two years to acquire 70 percent of the craft you will need to work in your medium. It will take another eight years to acquire the next 20 percent of your craft. At 90 percent, you will have mastered your craft, but there is that 10 percent that will take a lifetime to acquire. In the meantime, while working to master your craft (the technical skills and processes for working in your medium) you will also be learning and acquiring a personal vision, your ability to see, to observe, to create and discover things. This is difficult at first, but the older you get the wiser and more aware you become.”

    Cheers.

  4. john trenouth Avatar
    john trenouth

    Steve, that chess study was conducted by nobel laureate (psychology and economics–so a pretty smart guy) Herb Simon.

    Apparently Simon determined that it takes about 50,000 chuncks of information to become an expert, and it take about 10 years to acquire this many chuncks.

  5. jens Avatar
    jens

    nice. – question is: will we have time for this?

    weekend ft had a nice article “stuck in the muddle” on the endangered middle class.
    http://www.ft.com/cms/s/c2dfee66-ce57-11db-b5c8-000b5df10621.html

    if you have a society with an elite of plutocrats and pop stars of all kinds (the likes for example dan pink writes about), what will the strategy of an individual be to pursue success? – to excel in the “creative economy’ – to make use of your creative capital in case you have not got enough of the other – will you follow a strictly linear path? …probably not totally.

    creativity is about risk. as the business world embraces innovation we see that the only sensible answer to the new challenge is a portfolio strategy.

    individuals might be well-advised to do the same balancing act of their risk portfolio.

    as the new corporation will be dominantly influenced by both the culture of design AND the culture of private equity investing something similar might hold for individual career building.

    i think the new setting demands that you have to be ‘ready’ to be excellent much sooner than in ten years.
    you have to be ready to be excellent at any given moment – whenever fate strikes… – and you probably have to be ready to be excellent in a number of (related) fields.

  6. SunniPath Blog – » Two Education-Related Posts on “Noise Between Signals”

    […] Want to Be An Expert? Practice for Ten Years: “an intriguing finding dating to 1899, which shows that even the most talented individual requires a decade of committed practice before reaching world-class level.” […]

  7. Nifty Chatter – Page 1074 – indiTraders – Forum for the Active Indian Trader

    […] just took the bell curve route from stats. here is the link, Noise Between Stations Want to Be An Expert? Practice for Ten Years but yes individual cases may vary,Malcom Gladwell in his book "Outliers" have pointed […]