Month: March 2002

  • Is this mike on?

    Testing, testing…great, this seems to work. As threatened, I’ve moved my blog from Blogger to Tinderbox. As a first step I’ve simply replicated all the current functionality, so you shouldn’t notice much difference. Links should open in new windows these days.

    Gradually I’ll be using all the goodies of Tinderbox to do fun new stuff here, and will explain the reasoning behind the move. But I need more time.

    I haven’t had the chance to test my layout with all of the usual browsers, if you see something odd please let me know.

  • Usable, Useful, Desirable

    I’ve been thinking that different kinds of artifacts have different ratios of usability, usefulness, and desirability. It’d be nice to express this at the beginning of a project to set everyone’s expectations and syncronize design approaches. But how to express it?

    Perhaps by analogy?

    high desire, moderate usability

    moderately high desire, despite low usabilty

    only moderate desire, but high usability

    low desire, low usability

    Usefulness seems like a contextual and subjective quality, not a quality of the artifact itself. I could imagine owning two very different coffee makers and each would be more useful depending on the situation. A percolator is the best choice when you’re camping.

    Ultimately usability and desirability are relative too. For example, my sister-in-law loves the coffee from her percolator. As usual, it’s important to know who you’re designing for.

    Same idea, in PDF format.

  • Newspaper Delivery Guy

    My first job ever was delivering newspapers (maybe distributing information is a theme in my life?). So I felt a lot of empathy for the delivery guy I noticed out my window this morning. The Sunday New York Times is famous, even among people I know in Europe, for it’s bulk. Its ___ sections and ____ pages cost _____. Spending hours reading it while sipping coffee and eating bagels in a favorite pastime. Anyway, this guy had to double park midway down the block, load up a handtruck full of papers, and roll from building to building carrying a few papers into each building. Not quite the same joy I had riding my bike around the neighborhood tossing papers onto driveways, but his deliveries probably make people quite happy.

  • Tribute In Light

    I thought it might be gimicky, but upon seeing it – for the first time from Columbus Ave at West 87th St. – I thought it was rather beautiful and majestic. I like the idea that it’s temporary, a tribute and not a momument.

  • German Erotica

    “sechs-sechs-sechs, seiben sechs, seiben sechs” says the female voice over for the phone sex service, the German pronounciation of “6” deliberately punning on the English word “sex”. Late night television in Germany is full of these commericals for phone sex, complete with soft core video. Accordingly, they reflect the German standards of obscenity: nudity on TV is fine.

    To an American this is weird, of course, as all manner of churches and parent groups would sooner slit the broadcasters throats than allow soft core on television. So an American might come to the conclusion that pornography, what Americans consider pornography, is alright in Germany.

    So one night my German girlfriend and I are in bed in a hotel room. I’m flipping through the channels trying to find something in English that we’ll both understand. I come across the hotel’s pay porn channel playing a sample, hard core this time, and stop a moment to see what the German porn movies are like. She explodes. “What the hell are you doing? That’s pornography!” Uh, um, uh, I quickly change the channel.

    It took a few minutes for me to explain myself. I’m thinking “Germans are OK with porn on television” and figure that extends across the whole range of the genre. And Germans are thinking, “A little skin on television is fine, but anything beyond that is pornography!” They don’t erase the line, they just move it a little further out.